What I saw while Monitoring Social Media During the 2025 Elections

Intentional attempts by Bad Actors to mislead those seeking information.

False information shared by good or neutral actors in an earnest attempt to inform.

A partisan, or financially interested actor, who knowingly deceives for personal gain.

someone who volunteers their time during elections to ensure that voters are informed and supported while voting, regardless of their political affiliation.

A new generation of Democracy Workers Supported voters while social media users kept misinformation in check.

Posts containing the nonpartisan 866-OUR-Vote hotline.

Post from a user experiencing serious “I voted” selfie FOMO (fear of missing out)

Posts containing election disinformation over-performed on social media.

False claims about the security of Voter ID verification and Vote by mail were the most common. This content was viewed over 28 Million times (minimum estimate 27,949,900)

Grok AI contained misleading and politically biased claims in response to user prompts regarding the elections


Grok was marketed to be an “anti-PC” chat bot that prioritizes transparency and truth. Grok routinely shows right-wing bias with little to no extra prompting. Indicating that the model is trained on a great deal of right-wing content, and designed to agree with disinformation.

Discover more from Raelyn.Info

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Posted in , ,

One response to “What I saw while Monitoring Social Media During the 2025 Elections”

  1. […] While monitoring social media during the 2025 elections, I saw Grok responding to users with content that advocates for voter suppression laws, and emphatically validates high profile posts containing Voter ID disinformation. For chat bots to consistently do anything, let alone spread election falsehoods, they require vast databases and routine tuning- or result manipulation. […]

What are your thought?